One someinstances hears lamented the tendency of films to depict Mexico — and in particular, its capital Mexico Metropolis — as a menaceening, rough-and-tumble place the place human life has no value. Such concerns change into close toly as outdated as cinema itself, having first been raised in response to a toughly thirty-second-long movie referred to as Duel au pistolet from 1896. The French title owes to its having a French director: Gabriel Veyre, a contemporary of the cinema-pioneering Lumière brothers who first left France for Latin America as a way to display their early movies there.
On his travels, Veyre each exhibited Lumière movies and made his personal. “Between 1896 and 1897, he directed and professionalduced 35 movies in Mexico,” writes Jared Wheeler at Moviegoings. “Lots of these movies feature the Mexican president Porfirio Díaz in daily activities.” The motion captured in Duel au pistolet is “most probably a recreation of a well-known duel that had taken place in September 1894, between Colonel Francisco Romero and Jose Verástegui, the submitmaster general.” Plainly Romero had overheard Verástegui accusing him of not solely sleeping with a mutual good friend’s spouse, but additionally of having pulled strings to get that very same good friend a submit within the government.
His honor insulted, Romero demanded that Verástegui settle the matter with pistols in Chapultepec Park. By that point, dueling was a technically illegal however still-common practice, one “governed by a complex system of social norms that have been, for some, a supply of national pleasure as an indication of Mexico’s modernity, and of its kinship with other European nations like France.” But when a duel have been to be re-created and screened on movie out of its cultural contextual content, “would other nations recognize it as an honorready, dignified ritual, or simply see it as an indication that eachday life in Mexico was characterized by violence and barbarism?”
What nonetheless impresses about Duel au pistolet (a colorized version of which seems above), close toly 130 years after its debut, is much less the impression it provides of Mexico than its startling actualism, which has given even some modern-day viewers reason to gainedder whether or not it’s actually a re-enactment. Many “have commented on the naturalism of the duelist’s dying,” Wheeler writes, “one of many first to be depicted on display and really a lot in contrast to the melodramatic type that was extra typical of this time.” In actual life, it was Verástegui who misplaced, and Romero’s subsequent trial and imprisonment meant that Mexico’s days of dueling have been properly and truly numbered — however the history of onscreen violence had solely simply begun.
Related content:
The Final Duel Took Place in France in 1967, and It’s Caught on Movie
Based mostly in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His initiatives embrace the Substack newsletter Books on Cities and the ebook The Statemuch less Metropolis: a Stroll by means of Twenty first-Century Los Angeles. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Faceebook.